LATEST UPDATES
Millions of families & small businesses have justice problems every year, but most people go without help. Low-income people are particularly affected, but middle-class families and small businesses are also locked out of the civil justice system.
Often, people don’t even identify these problems—a credit card debt, a dispute with a landlord—as legal, or think there is anything that can be done about them. Or they think (often correctly) that they can’t afford a lawyer. Sometimes, these problems end up in court, where people are often on their own. In 3 out of 4 cases in state courts, at least one side is without legal representation.
The Rhode Center’s work seeks to help us better understand the causes and effects of this access crisis and identify possible policy solutions to drive impactful change. We produced the first empirical assessment of reforms to the regulation of legal practices implemented in Arizona and Utah and created the Legal Innovation Toolkit to help guide states considering regulatory reform. And in early 2024, we will be sponsoring a major conference with the RAND Corporation focused on bringing leading California policy makers together to engage in these critical conversations on regulation and access to legal help.
Most Americans facing civil justice problems in their daily lives either cannot or do not get legal help.
The justice gap is a multi-faceted problem with many layers of contributing factors. But scholars agree that one of the key factors are the state restrictions on the provision of legal services.
State supreme courts across the country are considering regulatory changes to increase access to justice. How might re-thinking the restrictions on the practice of law address the justice gap? What options are on the table and what do we know about the impacts of regulatory choice?
Most Americans facing civil justice problems in their daily lives either cannot or do not get legal help.
The justice gap is a multi-faceted problem with many layers of contributing factors. But scholars agree that one of the key factors are the state restrictions on the provision of legal services.
State supreme courts across the country are considering regulatory changes to increase access to justice. How might re-thinking the restrictions on the practice of law address the justice gap? What options are on the table and what do we know about the impacts of regulatory choice?
The Legal Regulatory Innovation Toolkit provides resources for policymakers and other stakeholders to better understand and engage with the questions driving the movement to rethink the regulation of legal services in the United States.
Designing and Implementing Legal Regulation
An analysis of alternative structural models for legal services regulation.
Re-Imagining the Bar
This white paper discusses options for state courts to re-structure the regulation of the practice of law.
Read the innovative proposal to increase the impact of legal aid in California.
Legal Innovation After Reform: Evidence from Regulatory Change Gain insights from the first empirical study of emerging innovation facilitated by legal regulatory reform.
The Surprising Success of Washington State’s Limited License Legal Technician Program
Learn how Washington’s program helped address access to justice.
of tenants in New York are unrepresented in eviction actions, and 96% are unrepresented in child support actions.