LATEST UPDATES
Read the new report: Legal Innovation After Reform—Five Years of Data on Regulatory Change Read More
Watch the Webinar: A Blueprint for Expanding Access to Justice in LA Superior Court’s Eviction Docket Read More
Rhode Center and Legal Design Lab Publish a Blueprint for Expanding Access to Justice in LA Superior Court Read More
See our current projects and events in our latest newsletter Read More
Center’s Detailed Toolkit on MDL Management Assists Federal Judges Read More
View David Freeman Engstrom’s talk on the tech & legal barriers to AI-based tools that can help close the justice gap Read More

Publications

Select Topic
Topic
Select Author
Author

Shedding Light on Secret Settlements: An Empirical Study of California’s STAND Act

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom, Jonah Gelbach, Austin Peters, Garrett Wen
  • Journal Article
  • ,
  • The University of Chicago Law Review,

The Litigation Transparency Project: Rhode Center Project Shines a Light on Secret Settlements and Protective Orders

  • Aaron Schaffer-Neitz, Garrett Wen
  • Article
  • ,
  • Stanford Lawyer,

Amicus Brief for Louis v. Bluegreen Vacations

  • Rose Carmen Goldberg, Brianne Holland-Stergar
  • Government Advocacy
  • ,
  • On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit,

Secrecy by Stipulation

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom, Jonah Gelbach, Austin Peters, Aaron Schaffer-Neitz
  • Working Paper
  • ,
  • Stanford Public Law Working Paper,

Amicus Brief in Support of Unsealing Documents in a Patent Lawsuit

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom, Jonah Gelbach, Rose Carmen Goldberg, Brianne Holland-Stergar
  • Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • ,

New Data on an Old Problem: Stanford’s Nora and David Freeman Engstrom Discuss their Study on Protective Orders and Court Secrecy

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom
  • Q&A
  • ,
  • Legal Aggregate,

Plaintiffs and Attorneys in Multidistrict Litigation: Strengths, Deficits, and Paths Forward

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom, Todd Venook, Silvie Saltzman
  • Report
  • ,
  • Stanford Law School Website,

Harnessing Common Benefit Fees to Promote MDL Integrity

  • Nora Freeman Engstrom, Todd Venook
  • Journal Article
  • ,
  • Texas Law Review,

Toward the Participatory MDL: A Low-Tech Step to Promote Litigant Autonomy

  • Nora Freeman Engstrom, Todd Venook
  • Book Section
  • ,
  • Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice,

Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Respondents

  • David Freeman Engstrom, Nora Freeman Engstrom
  • Brief
  • ,
  • Brief to the Texas Supreme Court,

Pursuing Public Health Through Litigation

  • Nora Freeman Engstrom
  • Journal Article
  • ,
  • Stanford Law School Review,

Lone Pine Orders: A Critical Examination and Empirical Analysis

  • Nora Freeman Engstrom
  • Journal Article
  • ,
  • University of Pennsylvania Law Review,

The Lessons of Lone Pine

  • Nora Freeman Engstrom
  • Journal Article
  • ,
  • Yale Law Journal,
Additional Publications
Stanford Law School, Deborah L. Rhode Logo
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford Law School
Stanford, CA 94305

Accessibility
Term of Use
Privacy