A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology 

  • Damien Charlotin has compiled a database tracking legal decisions in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content. [ongoing] 
  • Judge David L. Horan (N.D.T.X.) issued a Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence. [5/15/25]
  • The AI pilot lead at the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is exploring how district courts are using AI, FedScoop reports. [5/6/25]
  • Law.com reports on Garfield.Law, the first AI-driven law firm to receive regulated legal service authorization in England and Wales. [5/14/25]

Regulatory Innovation 

  • The Rhode Center released a new study on the Utah legal regulatory sandbox and the Arizona Alternative Business Structure program, Law360 reports. [6/2/25]
  • The Regulatory Review is publishing a series of essays on recent efforts by the Administrative Conference of the United States to support nonlawyer representation and assistance in federal agency proceedings. [6/2/25]

Courts, Rules & Access to Justice 

  • The Kansas Judicial Branch launched a new virtual self-help center. [6/2/25]
  • The State Bar of California has published an updated justice gap study, Law360 reports. [5/30/25]
  • A recent episode of Talk Justice podcast covers the Legal Services Corporation research brief “The Economic Case for Civil Legal Aid.” [5/27/25]
  • The American Bar Foundation Access to Justice Initiative published “State of the Art in Civil Legal Needs Surveys: A Comparative Perspective.” [5/25]
  • Matt Reynolds writes in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution about the rise of corporate landlords. [5/20/25]
  • The Pew Charitable Trusts surveyed states to identify whether and how court date reminders were being used across the country. [5/12/25] 
  • Cuts to the AmeriCorps program are impacting some court self-help programs, WGLT reports. [4/29/25] 

The Profession

  • The ABA Journal reports on challenges that women face in the legal profession. [6/1/25]
  • The Nevada Supreme Court approved a three-prong bar exam to launch in 2027, the ABA Journal reports. [5/28/25] 
  • Law360 reports that the California Bar has formally asked the California Supreme Court to approve a provisional licensure program in response to the February bar exam debacle. [5/27/25]
  • Illinois will move to the NextGen bar exam beginning in 2028, 2civility reports.
  • IAALS at the University of Denver launched a study to explore how different licensure pathways measure and uphold minimum competency in the legal profession. [5/13/25]

The ABA Journal reports that the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions is considering a proposal that would increase required experiential learning credit hours. [5/12/25]

Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology 

  • The U.K.’s Solicitors Regulation Authority has authorized the first law firm providing legal services through AI. [5/6/25]
  • The New York Times reports on generative AI hallucinations as a feature not a bug–and one that’s here to stay. [5/5/25]
  • The U.S. Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules voted 8-1 to seek public comment on a draft rule intended to ensure that evidence produced by generative AI meets the same reliability standards as evidence from human expert witnesses. [5/2/25]

Regulatory Innovation 

  • Pro Bono Institute writes about Arizona’s community justice workers and legal advocates in Arizona. [5/13/25]
  • Frontline Justice has developed a platform for community justice workers. [5/12/25] 
  • The Financial Times (paywall) reports on the anti-ABS legislation making its way through the California Legislature. [5/11/25]
  • Robert Rath, Chief Innovation Officer of the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration, details the regulatory innovation options under consideration in Indiana. [5/5/25]
  • A recording is available of the first webinar in a three-part series on UPL, hosted by IAALS, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System, and Duke Center on Law & Tech. [5/5/25]

Courts, Rules & Access to Justice

  • A poll conducted by the North Carolina Chamber of Commerce found, among other things, that respondents overwhelmingly (91%) support reminders for court dates, The Carolina Journal reports. [5/13/25]
  • Mark Palmer of 2Civility explores Illinois’s legal desert crisis. [5/9/25]
  • A new eviction sealing law went into effect in Massachusetts, NBC Boston reports. [5/5/25]
  • Researchers from George Washington University, Yale, Princeton, and others released a comprehensive study of right to counsel laws, Law360 reports. [4/28/25]   

The Profession 

  • Reuters reports that the California Bar is considering whether to expand a COVID-era provisional licensure program to aspiring lawyers who withdrew from or failed the troubled February exam. [5/12/25]
  • An article in CNN explores the political viability of pro bono. [5/7/25]
  • The ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar is recommending that the suspension of the diversity standard should be extended, ABA Journal reports. [5/5/25] 
  • May 5-9 was ABA Well-Being in Law week, and the Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs offered various resources for legal professionals. 
  • The Texas Supreme Court is accepting comments through July 1 on whether to do away with the requirement that lawyers in the state graduate from an ABA accredited law school. 
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology 

  • The New York Times reports (among other outlets) on the State Bar of California’s use of AI to develop bar exam questions and other testing breakdowns in the most recent test administration. [4/30/25]
  • LawNext reports that D.C. adopted an ethical duty of technology competence for lawyers just days after the New Jersey Supreme Court declined to do so. [4/24/25] 

Regulatory Innovation 

  • Michael Houlberg of the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System writes in Law360 about Allied Legal Professional programs in the states. [4/23/25] 

Courts, Rules & Access to Justice 

  • The Massachusetts Trial Court launched a guided interview for Petitions to Seal Eviction Records, developed in partnership with Suffolk University Law School. [5/5/25]
  • Lester Bird, at The Pew Charitable Trusts, published a piece that includes several recommendations for policymakers interested in reforming debt collection lawsuits for people without lawyers. [5/1/25]
  • Margaret Hagan at the Stanford Legal Design Lab and co-authors released an article exploring avenues through which the federal government might work to improve renters’ stability. [4/24/25]
  • The Superior Court of San Bernardino County partnered with the county Public Defender’s Office to create the Mobile Defense Program–dispatching RVs to isolated areas to facilitate litigant appearance in remote hearings. [4/23/25] 

The Profession

  • Connecticut is exploring a plan to allow attorneys to earn CLE credits by providing pro bono legal services, Law360 reports. [5/5/25]
  • The ABA Journal reports on the drop in overall pass rates as reported by many states for the February exam. [5/1/25]
  • The April 2025 edition of the ABA Law Practice Division’s Law Practice Today is dedicated to attorney well-being. [4/25]  
  • In a move away from the billable hour, the Illinois Supreme Court adopted a rule (effective July 1, 2025) clarifying that fee petitions can be based on any fee agreement, with limited exceptions, that is reasonable under the circumstances. [4/1/25]
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology 

  • A New York City Bar Association podcast explores the partnership between Microsoft and the Northwest Immigrants Rights Project to streamline and scale the DACA renewal process for Dreamers. [4/17/25] 
  • RAILS (Responsible AI in Legal Services) at Duke Law has compiled a table of resources on access to justice, tech innovation, and regulation. [4/14/25]
  • A self-represented litigant deployed an AI avatar in a prerecorded video presentation before an appellate panel of New York State judges, the New York Times reports. Fortune also reports. [4/4/25]  An article in Business Insider (paywall) reports on the fallout. [4/11/25]
  • An article in Forbes covers the Stanford CodeX and DLA Piper Law Track Conference of the UN AI For Good global platform. [4/10/25]
  • The Georgetown University Law Center’s Global Perspectives on AI and the Law talks are now live. [3/19/25]

Regulatory Innovation 

  • California Assembly Bill 931 on consumer legal funding has moved out of the Assembly and been referred to committee in the Senate. [4/21/25]
  • The UPL lawsuit against LegalZoom is heading to arbitration, Law360 reports. [4/17/25]
  • An article by Joanna Goodman in the Law Society Gazette discusses ongoing conversations about legal regulation and legal culture in response to the Post Office scandal and other high-profile incidents involving lawyers. [4/11/25]  
  • An ABA Journal article covers a discussion at ABA Midyear on regulatory innovation and the efforts undertaken in Arizona. [4/10/25]
  • Law360 reports (paywall) that KPMG and Google Cloud are partnering to co-develop offerings for AI-assisted contract review, research, and document analysis for KPMG Law US, operating as an alternative business structure in Arizona. [4/9/25]  

Courts, Rules & Access to Justice 

  • The Texas House of Representatives Family & Fiduciary Relationships Subcommittee is considering HB 3819 that would require probate courts to allow parties to appear remotely for hearings in uncontested cases. [4/22/25]
  • A New York Times Magazine article explores the human face of unrepresented litigation. [4/17/25]
  • A recap and the recording of Harvard Law School’s Center on the Legal Profession’s conference “Inequality, Access to Justice, and the Rule of Law” is now available. Rhode Center Co-Director David Freeman Engstrom leads a panel discussion on The Future of Access to Justice. [4/11/25]
  • Bob Ambrogi covers the recent release of the Stanford and LA Superior Court project report, on LawSites. [4/10/25]
  • The National Center for State Courts has released a Tiny Chat on Referrals. 
  • Rhode Center Co-Director Nora Freeman Engstrom appears on Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything Podcast to discuss the civil justice gap. [4/4/25]
  • A new project has launched that is exploring how a range of funding models might be deployed to support the work of U.K. organizations providing free legal advice; the research is a collaboration between the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, the Access to Justice Foundation, and the University of Surrey. [4/1/25]

The Profession

  • Researchers from the Australian National University and University of Melbourne published findings from a survey on lawyer wellbeing, workplace incivility, and ethics. [4/16/25]
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology

  • Stanford HAI’s 2025 AI Index Report is out. [4/7/25]
  • Joe Patrice in Above the Law reports on an ABA TECHSHOW session exploring the role of AI as a way to bridge the access to justice gap. [4/3/25]
  • Writing in The Times, Richard Susskind explores whether AI could replace traditional lawyers (and do so by 2035). [3/27/25]
  • In what the ABA Journal reports is an “‘extremely rare’ move,” law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton has acquired legal technology company Springbok AI. [3/18/25]
  • The American Bar Association released the 2024 Legal Technology Survey Report, the ABA Journal reports. [3/4/25]

Regulatory Innovation

  • Jonathan Adler writes in The Volokh Conspiracy about a new study on the effects of occupational licensing on the legal profession. [3/26/25]
  • Crispin Passmore appears on The Future Is Bright Podcast discussing alternative business structures. [3/25/25]
  • Michael Houlberg, of the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System, appears on the Paralegal Boot Camp podcast, discussing regulatory innovation. [3/22/25]
  • California Assembly Bill 931 seeks to prohibit lawyers from sharing fees with out-of-state, nonlawyer-owned alternative business structures. [2/19/25]

Courts, Rules & Access to Justice 

  • Stanford Law School’s Rhode Center and Legal Design Lab, in partnership with the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, have published a diagnostic report that outlines a blueprint for creating more innovative, modern, and accessible courts. Read more about the effort and sign up for an upcoming webinar to engage in a discussion about the research and the report. [4/3/25]
  • The American Arbitration Association® launched new Consumer Mediation Procedures which are designed for lower-value consumer disputes. [3/31/25] 
  • The National Center for State Courts released a new report–”Preserving the Future of Juries and Jury Trials”–that discusses the challenges of declining juror participation and jury trials and offers strategic solutions. [3/26/25]

The Profession

  • 363 law professors submitted an amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie. ABA Journal also reports. [4/8/25]
  • The National Center for State Courts reports on the National Convening on the Future of Legal Education, hosted by the CCJ/COSCA Committee on Legal Education and Admissions Reform (CLEAR). [3/19/25]
  • Sara Randazzo of the Wall Street Journal writes about the highly competitive law school admissions year. [3/15/25]
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology 

  • The World Justice Project, in partnership with the World Bank, released “Advancing Access to Justice Via Information and Communications Technology: A Literature Review.” [3/21/25]
  • Michael Bommarito, Daniel Katz, and Jillian Bommarito published a new paper on the domain-specific tokenizers they developed for the KL3M (Kelvin Legal Large Language Model) dataset and models. [3/21/25]
  • The Stanford Legal Design Lab’s AI and Access to Justice Initiative reports on a recent webinar sharing how the Citizens Advice SORT group (part of the broader Citizen Advice network in England) uses generative AI to support their advisors. [3/20/25]  
  • Writing in Above the Law, Stephen Embry questions whether technology alone can solve rural legal deserts. [3/19/25]
  • Michael Navin, of the National Center for State Courts, has a counterpoint to the Arizona Supreme Court’s AI Avatar reporters. [3/18/25] 

Regulatory Innovation 

  • The Arizona Supreme Court has adopted new Arizona Code of Judicial Administration §7-211: Community-Based Justice Work Service Delivery Models. [3/19/25]
  • The Financial Times reports that Big Four accounting firm EY is overhauling its UK law business. [3/19/25]
  • Ed Walters, Chief Strategy Officer of vLex, has a piece in the TECHSHOW Issue of Law Practice Magazine on re-regulating UPL in the age of AI. [3/1/25] 
  • Also in the TECHSHOW Issue of Law Practice Magazine, ethics attorney Lucian Pera provides guidance on the ethics issues with litigation funding. [3/1/25] 

Courts & Rules

  • California Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero delivered the State of the Judiciary Address, discussing, among other things, the expansion of remote proceedings, the recent bar exam failure, and reforms to the State Bar’s operations. [3/18/25]
  • Maya Buenaventura and Paul Heaton, of RAND, discuss the impact of access to civil legal aid on improved housing stability. [3/12/25]
  • The Pew Courts & Communities project released an interactive chart detailing the breakdown of case types in state courts in 2024. [3/6/25]

The Profession

  • The State Bar of California is recommending that the California Supreme Court offer provisional licenses for candidates who fail or withdrew from the February Kaplan-authored exam, ABA Journal reports. [3/17/25]
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

At the Rhode Center, we do our best to keep abreast of news relevant to our work. What began as an internal newsletter, we are now excited to offer our A2J Briefing more broadly, to you! Nothing formal here, just a collection of stories and developments that we find interesting. If you have a tip on an article, feel free to contact us here. And learn more about our work at https://clp.law.stanford.edu/.
 
Technology
  • Legaltech Hub released an interactive map of generative AI legal tech. [3/6/25]
  • Two major studies have been released on AI in legal tasks: 
    • Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial assessing six legal tasks using a RAG-powered legal AI tool (Vincent AI), an AI reasoning model (OpenAI’s o1-preview), or no AI. LawSites reports. [3/4/25] & [3/5/25]
    • The Vals Legal AI Report evaluates and benchmarks AI tools from four vendors: Harvey, CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters), Vincent AI (vLex), and Oliver (Vecflow). Legal Insider reports. [2/27/25]
  • A.G.I anyone? Ezra Klein writes for the New York Times. [3/4/25]
  • LawSites reports that LexisNexis plans to work closely with OpenAI to integrate OpenAI’s LLMs and APIs across the LexisNexis ecosystem. [2/27/25]
  • A piece on Community Justice Workers appears in Work Shift. [2/24/25]
  • Margaret Hagan, Executive Director of the Legal Design Lab at Stanford Law School, published a new Medium article on her research into quality standards for AI legal help. [2/20/25] 
  • A number of RAILS working groups (Responsible AI in Legal Services) have published their efforts, including Use Cases for GenAI in Legal and AI Risk Management Framework: Guidance for Corporate Legal Teams. [Various]

Regulatory Innovation 

  • Reuters reports on the narrowing of the Utah legal services regulatory sandbox. [3/3/25]
  • Ethicist Lucia Pera writes about nonlawyer-owned law firms in FedSoc’s Regulatory Transparency Project blog, arguing that it’s time to rethink ABA Formal Opinion 91-360 (1991). [3/3/15]
  • The Arizona Supreme Court has approved KPMG’s application for an ABS license. Multiple outlets reporting: Bloomberg Law; Reuters; Forbes; LawSites. [2/27/25]   
  • Mother Jones published a piece on the lawyer monopoly and its impact on access to civil legal services. [Feb.25] 
  • The South Dakota Supreme Court has approved a pilot program for alternative licensure that will allow law students to bypass the bar exam with two years in a public service legal position and successful completion of an ethics test. [2/25/25]
  • The ABA Journal’s The Modern Law Library podcast covers Rebecca Haw Allensworth’s new book The Licensing Racket. [2/19/25]

Courts & Rules 

  • The Virginia State Bar solicited public comments on a proposal that would allow court clerks, self-help staff, librarians, and courthouse navigators to answer questions and assist with selecting and completing court forms. Frontline Justice reports. [3/5/25] 
  • Harvard’s Access to Justice Lab published research on expungement in several counties in Pennsylvania and Kansas which supports an analysis on which statutory reforms would render the largest number of cases eligible for record clearing. [100 N.D. L. Rev. 11 (2025)]   
  • The Pew Courts & Communities project team discusses how medical debt that winds up in courts can be difficult to spot. [2/27/25] 
  • The Working Group on AI and the Courts of the ABA Task Force on Law and AI has published guidelines for the responsible use of AI in judicial settings. The guidelines were released in The Sedona Conference Journal. LawSites reports. [2/26/25]  
Posted in a2j

A2J Briefing: News from the Field

Technology

  • The FTC has finalized the order with DoNotPay, requiring the company to pay $193,000 in monetary relief and notify consumers about the settlement. [2/11]
  • Sateesh Nori at Justi-Tech and Adjunct Professor at NYU has announced the launch of Roxanne AI, an AI-powered chatbot designed to provide tenants with actionable legal information on repairs and housing conditions, Law360 reports. [2/7]
  • Another law firm, Morgan & Morgan, is in hot water for submitting genAI hallucinated case law. [2/7]
  • The Ada Lovelace Institute released a policy briefing on Advanced AI Assistants titled Delegation Nation that mentions legal applications. [2/4]
  • Dr. Megan Ma, Associate Director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology at CodeX has a new article out, Opportunities and Challenges in Legal AI. [1/6]

Regulatory Innovation

  • Professor Rebecca Haw Allensworth at Vanderbilt University has published a new book on AI and regulatory reform: “The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong.” Marketplace Tech podcast has an episode on it. [2/11]
  • Texas professional ethics opinion 704 prohibits Texas lawyers from joining law firms with nonlawyer owners, even if the law firm is based in a jurisdiction that allows for nonlawyer ownership. [Feb.]
  • A bill introduced in the WA Senate (SJM 8006) seeks to revive the LLLT program. The bill would also expand LLLT authorization to provide eviction and debt assistance. [1/20]
  • The Wall Street Journal reports on KPMG’s application for an Arizona ABS license. [1/20]
  • Fordham University Professor Bruce Green published a new article, with co-author Professor Ellen Murphy at Wake Forest University, on certifications for nonlawyer legal services providers that borrows from standards set by federal administrative agencies. [1/13]
  • The NCSC State of the State Courts 2024 poll (administered in late Dec. 2024) found that 60% of respondents support a proposal to expand who can provide legal services (i.e., nonlawyer providers). The public also supports the use of AI in courts if it increases efficiency/access. [Jan.]

Courts & Rules

  • Paul Prettitore, Senior Specialist at The World Bank, has a new piece via Brookings about the distribution of legal problems across income groups. [2/7]
  • NCSC has launched the Fines, Fees, and Pretrial Practices 2.0 Resource Center. Among the new additions are case studies, bench cards, and an interactive map of state court reforms. [1/22]
  • Wesleyan University Professor Alyx Mark has published a new book: Courts Unmasked: Civil Legal System Reform and COVID-19. [Jan.]

The Profession

  • The FTC is pulling support for the ABA given the organization’s purported alignment with the Democrat Party and Big Tech. [2/14]
  • The ABA Journal reports on the House of Delegates vote to adopt a new model rule on conditional admission to the practice of law that focuses on conduct instead of mental health-related diagnoses. [2/3]
  •  A recently released ABA report (reporting on 2022 data) finds that most lawyers are failing to meet the ABA’s 50-hour pro bono goal. [1/20]

Events

Posted in a2j